attraction by the previous ruling get together in opposition to the outcomes of


I consider that the earlier ruling get together, the Progressive Democratic Party, has the appropriate to hunt a authorized answer, particularly on this case the place it considers that an injustice has been finished. The necessary factor is that the chief decide testified that this case was constitutional. It is about discovering the appropriate stability between prioritizing political stability over the rule of legislation or prioritizing the rule of legislation over political stability. And I believe the trail that has actually been taken is to emphasise the rule of legislation over political penalties. In my opinion, it’s a technique to keep away from political instability and the results of letting the progressive democratic get together go and argue in court docket. We cannot assume that it’s as a result of the matter goes to court docket that the present authorities can be faraway from workplace. Because there we will be in a vicious circle the place the federal government not derives its legitimacy from the vote, however from the courts.

Boniface Dulani, political scientist on the University of Malawi


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More